chess vs computer

Chess Vs Computer

Grant and you will reveal!
Funky name, real matters
[ Sign up | Log in | Guest ] (beta)
xerox 43 ( +1 | -1 )
analyses Could you help me with analyses of this game. board #1528921
I've got chance to win this game untill I made a mistake:(43. Bc5)...
But I'm interested in whole this game...
So If your interested and have time or just like to analyse games, than maybe you could post you analyses here...
thanks in advance...
(sorry for my bad english)
More: Chess
bartlebie 17 ( +1 | -1 )
Just looking with speed over the game...
what about 32.f4
Threatening 33. Rd7
After 32. ...Nc4
33. Rd7 Re7
34. Qb7 R8d8 (Rxd7 35. Qxc8+)
35. Rxe7 Qxe7 (Rxe7 36. Qc8+ Re8 37. Qxc4)
36. Qc6!

white is more than ok.
loreta 13 ( +1 | -1 )
quick look > I made a mistake:(43. Bc5)...
I've a suspicion about moves of White (going backward)
a) 42. Nd6
b) 41. Qxf5
I've to dip deeper to see if it's possible enhance them...
baseline 119 ( +1 | -1 )


xerox - dominickmazzotta [B03]
gameknot, 07.05.2004
[baseline]

1.e4 Nf6 2.e5 Nd5 3.d4 d6 4.c4 Nb6 5.exd6 cxd6 6.Nc3 g6 7.Be3 Bg7 8.Bd3 0-0 9.Nge2 Nc6 10.0-0 Bg4 11.h3 [More common is 11.f3 Bf5 12.b3 Bxd3 13.Qxd3 d5 where White trades off his bad bishop.] 11...Bxe2 12.Nxe2 It's difficult to find examples of this anti-positional move. 12...e5 13.d5 [13.dxe5 dxe5 14.Rc1 Qe7 15.c5 Nd5 16.Be4 Nxe3 17.fxe3 Bh6 18.Qb3 Rac8 19.Rf3 Nd8 20.Qd5 Ne6 21.Qxb7 Qxb7 22.Bxb7 Rxc5 23.Rxc5 Nxc5 24.Bd5 e4 25.Rg3 Rb8 26.Nc3 Rxb2 27.Nxe4 Nxe4 28.Bxe4 Rxa2 29.Bd5 Ra5 30.e4 Kg7 31.Rb3 f5 32.Rb7+ Kf6 33.Rxh7 Be3+ 34.Kf1 Ke5 35.Ke2 Bb6 36.Re7+ Kd4 37.Bb7 g5 38.Rd7+ Ke5 39.exf5 1/2-1/2 Furmston,M-Van der Tak,A/olm9 corr7789 1977] 13...Nb4 14.b3 [14.Nc3 Nxd3 15.Qxd3 Rc8 16.b3 f5 17.Rac1 a6 18.Bxb6 Qxb6 19.Na4 Qa5 20.c5 e4 21.Qe3 Be5 22.Rfd1 Rfe8 23.g3 Qd8 24.c6 bxc6 25.Nb6 f4 26.gxf4 Bxf4 27.Qxf4 Qxb6 28.dxc6 Rf8 29.Qd2 Rf7 30.Rc2 Rxc6 31.Rxc6 Qxc6 32.Qxd6 Qc2 33.Qd8+ Rf8 34.Qd2 Qc8 35.Qd5+ Rf7 36.Qd8+ Rf8 37.Qd5+ Rf7 38.Kg2 Qc2 39.Qd8+ Kg7 40.Rd2 Qc3 41.Qd4+ Qxd4 42.Rxd4 Re7 43.Ra4 Re6 44.Kf1 Kh6 45.Ke2 Kg5 46.Ke3 Kh4 47.Rxe4+ Rxe4+ 48.Kxe4 Kxh3 49.b4 h5 50.Kf4 Kg2 51.Kg5 Kf3 52.a4 Ke4 53.f4 Kd5 1/2-1/2 Da Nobrega,A-Van der Tak,A/corr 1979] 14...e4 from here out the game looks well played by both players improvements over individual moves will be difficult to find. 15.Bxe4 Qe7= 16.a3 Qxe4 17.axb4 Bxa1 18.Qxa1 Rfe8 19.Nc3 Qe7 20.Nb5 a6 21.Bh6 f6 22.Nd4 Nd7 23.Ne6 Rac8 24.Ng7 Red8 25.Re1 Qf7 26.Re6 b5 27.Rxd6 bxc4 28.bxc4 Rxc4 29.Qxa6 Rcc8 30.Ne6 Re8 31.Qb5 Ne5 32.Be3 Rb8 33.Rb6 Rxb6 34.Qxb6 Nc4 35.Qc6 Ne5 36.Qa4 Qd7 37.b5 Rc8 38.Qf4 Kf7 39.Ng5+ Kg7 40.Ne4 Qf5 41.Qxf5 gxf5 42.Nd6 Rd8 43.Bc5 [43.Nxf5+ Kf7 44.d6 Rb8 45.b6 Ke6 46.g4 Nc4 still looks like a draw to me.] 43...Kg6 44.f4 Nf7 45.Nxf7 Kxf7 46.d6 Ke6 47.Kf2 Rc8 48.Be3 Kxd6 49.Kf3 Kd5 why resign? this looks like a draw to me.

loreta 15 ( +1 | -1 )
About draw... I agree with baseline - the final position looks with chances for a draw - anyway, Black has to work hard to realise his advantage....
chrisp 28 ( +1 | -1 )
Nxf5 I think that you play the simple 43. Nxf5+. The game looks like a draw to me after that - I can't see how black is going to win. I also agree with baseline, that resigning the final position was a bit premature - not that easy for black to turn edge into a win.
sualksnh 52 ( +1 | -1 )
final position To me the final position looks hopeless. Black will pin the white bishop with his rook and then wait until White runs out of pawn moves. Then he'll gain the square e4 for his king and the white position crumbles. I see no defense against this simple plan. Maybe White should try to exchange some pawns: 50.g4 Rc3! 51.gxf5 [51.g5 fxg5 52.fxg4 Ke5 threatening 35...f4] 51...Rb3 52.b6 Ra3 53.h4 [53.b7 Rb3 54.Kg4 Rxb7 is also an easy win] 53...h5 54.Kf2 Ke4 and Black will pick up both white f-pawns and then win easily. Am I missing something?